While reading some of the stories about my ancestors' life on the farm, I wonder how they did common tasks. One of the tasks was "feeding the pigs."
I asked OpenAI ChatGPT5 the question: "I have so many farmers in my ancestry, and they all had pigs on their farm. Please explain how they fed the pigs and used the pigs for food or sale."
(AI Google Gemini Notebook Infographic - Pigs on the farm in the 19th century)
The
Feeding and Use of Pigs and Hogs
In the 19th century
Pigs were almost the perfect farm animal for a 19th-century
American farm. They could turn things people couldn't easily
eat—kitchen scraps, garden waste, spoiled or surplus grain, milk
byproducts, and pasture—into pork, lard, and money.
For many of your farming ancestors, the pig pen was essentially a
small food-processing plant attached to the barn.
What did they feed the pigs?
The exact diet varied with the farm, season, and period, but pigs
were remarkably flexible eaters.
Corn was usually the basic feed. Farmers might
feed pigs whole corn, shelled corn, cornmeal, or corn that had been
ground or soaked. On farms growing corn, pigs were a convenient way
to convert the crop into something much more valuable than the raw
grain.
But pigs also received a tremendous variety of other food:
- Kitchen scraps: vegetable peelings, potato
skins, stale bread, table scraps and other leftovers.
- Garden waste: cabbage leaves, turnips,
pumpkins, squash, beets and other surplus vegetables.
- Milk and dairy waste: skim milk and
buttermilk could be especially valuable pig feed on dairy farms.
- Grain waste: oats, wheat, barley and the
screenings and waste left after milling.
- Potatoes: surplus or small potatoes were
commonly cooked or otherwise prepared for pigs.
- Fruit: windfall apples and other fruit that
wasn't suitable for the family table.
- Pasture: pigs could forage for roots,
insects, acorns and other natural foods.
- Farm waste: pigs could consume materials
that otherwise had little value.
One important point is that feeding pigs was not
necessarily an elaborate operation. A farmer might simply
carry a bucket or trough of feed to the hog pen once or twice a day.
On a larger farm, feeding several dozen hogs could become a
substantial daily chore.
The farmer was really "feeding corn
through a pig"
This is an important concept for understanding the economics of
your farming ancestors.
Suppose a farmer raised corn. He could sell the corn, but he could
also feed it to pigs. The pig converted the corn into pork
and fat, which were considerably more valuable and useful on
the farm.
So a farmer might think of his hogs as a way of marketing
his grain through livestock.
There was another advantage: pigs produced manure. That manure
went back onto the fields and helped maintain soil fertility.
It created a little agricultural cycle:
Corn → pigs → pork/lard + manure → fields → more
corn
That was particularly important before modern commercial
fertilizers became commonplace.
Pigs weren't necessarily kept in a tiny pen
all year
The image of pigs permanently standing in a muddy pen can be
misleading.
On many farms, especially earlier in the 19th century, pigs were
allowed to range or forage. They might be turned
into woodlots, fields, orchards or pasture where they could find
roots, nuts, insects and other food.
In the autumn, pigs could be particularly useful in woodlands
with mast, especially acorns. A farmer could essentially let
the pigs harvest part of the forest's food supply themselves.
Later, more farmers used fenced hog lots and specialized pens,
making feeding more controlled.
And the pigs had to be protected from weather. A barn or hog house
gave them shelter, especially in winter.
What happened when the pigs were ready?
This is where pigs became extremely important to the farm
household.
A farmer generally had two choices: Sell the live hogs or butcher
them for the family's use. Sometimes he did both.
A family might keep several pigs and sell some while reserving one
or more for winter meat.
For a farm family, butchering hogs was a major seasonal event. It was often done in late fall or early winter,
after cold weather arrived. The cold helped preserve the meat before
refrigeration.
The process was labor-intensive. The hog was slaughtered, scalded, and scraped to remove the hair.
It was then opened and dressed. The carcass was divided into familiar
cuts:
- hams
- shoulders
- bacon
- ribs
- chops
- sausage
- jowls
- spare ribs
And almost nothing useful was wasted.
The fat was enormously valuable
One of the most important products wasn't actually the meat.
It was lard. The fatty portions of the pig were rendered in a large kettle. The
melted fat was strained and stored. Lard could be used for:
- frying
- baking
- biscuits
- pie crusts
- cooking
- greasing pans
- soap making
- various household purposes
Before modern vegetable oils became common, lard was a
basic household commodity.
A successful hog could therefore supply a family with a
considerable quantity of cooking fat.
Preserving the pork
Your ancestors didn't have a refrigerator or freezer, so producing
pork was only half the problem. They also had to preserve it.
The traditional method was curing with salt.
Hams and shoulders were rubbed or packed with salt, sometimes with
additional ingredients such as sugar or saltpeter. They were allowed
to cure for weeks.
Then they could be smoked.
A farm might have a small smokehouse where hams,
shoulders, bacon and other meat were hung over a slow, smoky fire.
Properly cured and smoked meat could last for many months.
This was crucial because the farmer's hog wasn't simply providing
tonight's dinner. One hog might help feed the family
for much of the coming year.
Sausage and the "everything but the
squeal" principle
Farm families tried very hard not to waste anything.
- Trimmed meat and scraps could become sausage.
- The intestines could be cleaned and used as sausage casings.
- The head could provide meat for head cheese or other preparations.
- The feet could be pickled.
- The skin could have uses.
- Even the blood could sometimes be incorporated into traditional
foods.
Hence the old saying that farmers used "everything
but the squeal."
It wasn't merely colorful folklore. For a family living largely
from what its farm produced, wasting usable animal products made
little economic sense.
And pigs were a source of cash
This may be the most interesting aspect for your family-history
research. A farmer didn't necessarily raise hogs simply because his family
liked pork.
Hogs were livestock that could be converted into cash.
A farmer could sell:
young pigs
breeding stock
fattening hogs
mature hogs
dressed pork
hams and bacon
lard
The farmer might take hogs to a local market, butcher,
livestock buyer, railroad shipping point, or larger regional market.
In areas such as Pennsylvania, Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Iowa and
Wisconsin, hog production became increasingly important as
transportation and commercial meatpacking developed during the 19th
century.
A typical farm might have a little "pig
economy"
Imagine one of your ancestors around 1850.
He might have a few breeding sows and a boar—or obtain breeding
services elsewhere.
The sows produce a litter of piglets. Some piglets are retained as future breeding animals. Others are raised for meat.
The farmer feeds them surplus grain, kitchen waste, garden produce
and whatever they can forage.
As autumn approaches, the farmer decides: "We'll keep two for the winter and sell four."
The ones being sold are taken to market.
The two remaining hogs are fattened through the fall. In November or December, they're butchered. The family spends several days processing the carcasses.
The resulting hams and shoulders go into curing. The bacon is prepared. The sausage is made. The fat is rendered into lard.
And suddenly the farm has a winter's supply of meat and cooking
fat. That's farm self-sufficiency in action.
Why pigs were
particularly important to farm families
There was also a practical family reason for keeping pigs.
Cattle were extremely useful, but a cow was a relatively large
investment and provided milk and perhaps draft power or breeding
stock.
A pig was comparatively easy to raise and reproduce
quickly.
A family could start with only a few animals and build a herd.
And unlike cattle, pigs didn't have to be kept primarily for milk
or work. Their principal product was food, and they
could reach market weight relatively quickly.
That's why when you look at old agricultural censuses, farm
inventories, probate records and diaries, you frequently encounter
surprisingly large numbers of hogs.
And then I asked: "Would the farmer slaughter and butcher the pigs, or would a butcher do
it?"
The ChatGPT5 Response was:
For most of the 19th century, if the pig was being raised
for the family's own use, the farmer and his family would normally
slaughter and butcher it themselves. If the pig was being
sold, however, the situation was different—the buyer, butcher, or
eventually a commercial meatpacker would generally do the
slaughtering.
On the farm
A typical farm family would have done the entire job themselves,
often with help from neighbors or relatives. It was a big,
messy, labor-intensive job, so butchering day was often a
community affair.
The basic sequence was:
Kill the hog —
usually by bleeding it after stunning or otherwise dispatching it.
Scald and scrape it
— the carcass was immersed in very hot water so the hair could be
scraped off.
Gut it — the
internal organs were removed and saved or discarded according to
their use.
Split and cool the carcass
— the meat needed to cool quickly in cold weather.
Cut it up —
hams, shoulders, bacon, ribs, chops, sausage meat, etc.
Render the fat —
the fatty pieces were cooked down into lard.
Cure the meat — salt, brine, and/or smoke
were used to preserve the hams, shoulders and bacon.
The farmer might have had special equipment—a
large iron kettle for scalding or rendering, butcher knives, meat
hooks, a chopping block, barrels for brine, and perhaps a smokehouse.
But there were professionals, too
A farmer could hire a local butcher to come to
the farm and do the job, particularly if the family didn't have the
necessary skill or help.
And there was an important distinction between a farm
butcher and a commercial butcher.
If your ancestor took a live hog into town and sold it to a
butcher, the butcher would normally take possession of the animal and
handle the slaughtering and dressing. The farmer got paid for the
animal rather than dealing with the carcass.
By the late 19th century, this became increasingly commercialized.
Farmers could ship or haul hogs to livestock markets, where they were
purchased by butchers and eventually by large packing companies.
Summary
For a typical Pennsylvania, Iowa, Wisconsin, or New York farm
family in the 1840–1900 period, Home
slaughtering was probably the norm for the hogs intended for household
consumption, unless there is evidence otherwise. It was
simply part of being a farm family.
There's also a fascinating social side to this: hog-butchering
day could be one of the biggest workdays of the year, with
several men doing the slaughtering and cutting while women and
children handled sausage, lard, cleaning, cooking, and preservation.
===================================
The Google Gemini Notebook Video Overview of this story is below and on my YouTube channel:
This process may seem so quaint and complicated to modern readers (who usually get their pork products from a grocery story ready to cook), but it was necessary for our ancestors in the 19th century and before. But somebody had to do it.
The social history of almost any time and place is available in the pre-trained masterial used by the AI Large Language Models. In the recent past, we would have to find and read books about farm life, take notes, and write a story about it. Now the AI tools can answer our questions in minutes and present it in a logical way for our understnading.
==============================================
Copyright (c) 2026, Randall J. Seaver
Please comment on this post on the website by clicking the URL above and then the "Comments" link at the bottom of each post. Share it on X, Facebook, or Pinterest using the icons below. Or contact me by email at randy.seaver@gmail.com. Note that all comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately. Subscribe to receive a free daily email from Genea-Musings using www.Blogtrottr.com.
